Class Evaluations
 
 


Last Updated: 7/18/07
 

The following are summaries of official class evaluations for some of the classes Dr. Korcz has taught.
 

PHIL 101 Introduction to Philosophy

PHIL 111 Contemporary Moral Dilemmas

PHIL 210 Practical Argumentation

PHIL 314 Ethics

PHIL 329 Skepticism

PHIL 331 Philosophy of Religion

PHIL  441 Theory of Knowledge
 



PHIL 101 Introduction to Philosophy

Evaluations are for Fall 2000, Fall 2001 and Spring 2002. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
 
 
 
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
The instructor presented material in an understandable manner.
33
19
0
1
1
The instructor's exams reflected what was covered in the course.
35
17
2
0
0
With this instructor I felt free to ask questions and express opinions.
39
11
4
1
0
If I asked for help with the course, this instructor provided help.
33
13
5
1
0
This instructor used the same criteria to grade all students in the course.
38
14
3
0
0
The instructor provided timely feedback about my performance in the course.
34
15
5
0
0
The course requirements, including the grading criteria, were stated clearly in writing.
37
16
1
0
0
Materials used for this course (textbooks, readings, supplementary materials) were clear enough for me to understand.
24
21
5
3
0
This course was well organized.
32
20
0
0
0
This course contributed to my understanding of this subject.
36
13
1
1
2
This survey was administered in a manner that allowed me to answer anonymously.
44
10
0
0
0
Compared to other instructors I have had, I rate this instructor:
Top 10%

27
Top 30%

18
Average

7
Lowest 30%

2
Lowest 10%

1
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was:
Much Lighter

2
Lighter

4
Same

37
Heavier

9
Much Heavier

3

Top
 



PHIL 111 Contemporary Moral Dilemmas

Evaluations are for Fall 2001 through Spring 2006. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
 
 
 
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
The instructor presented material in an understandable manner.
75
48
3
5
1
The instructor's exams reflected what was covered in the course.
86
43
2
0
1
With this instructor I felt free to ask questions and express opinions.
87
35
4
3
3
If I asked for help with the course, this instructor provided help.
72
37
15
2
0
This instructor used the same criteria to grade all students in the course.
70
36
12
2
1
The instructor provided timely feedback about my performance in the course.
73
41
15
0
2
The course requirements, including the grading criteria, were stated clearly in writing.
88
41
2
0
1
Materials used for this course (textbooks, readings, supplementary materials) were clear enough for me to understand.
65
42
10
13
3
This course was well organized.
89
40
1
1
1
This course contributed to my understanding of this subject.
81
41
3
4
3
This survey was administered in a manner that allowed me to answer anonymously.
82
33
4
3
0
Compared to other instructors I have had, I rate this instructor:
Top 10%

51
Top 30%

53
Average

23
Lowest 30%

1
Lowest 10%

2
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was:
Much Lighter

5
Lighter

15
Same

62
Heavier

22
Much Heavier

6

Top
 



PHIL 210 Practical Argumentation

Evaluations are for Fall 2002, Spring 2003, Fall 2003, Fall 2004, Fall 2005 and Fall 2006. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
 
 
 
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
The instructor presented material in an understandable manner.
58
38
0
5
1
The instructor's exams reflected what was covered in the course.
73
30
0
1
0
With this instructor I felt free to ask questions and express opinions.
78
27
5
3
1
If I asked for help with the course, this instructor provided help.
66
26
9
0
1
This instructor used the same criteria to grade all students in the course.
70
25
3
0
3
The instructor provided timely feedback about my performance in the course.
75
25
4
0
0
The course requirements, including the grading criteria, were stated clearly in writing.
77
23
3
0
0
Materials used for this course (textbooks, readings, supplementary materials) were clear enough for me to understand.
55
42
1
7
0
This course was well organized.
77
36
2
0
0
This course contributed to my understanding of this subject.
68
22
4
3
3
This survey was administered in a manner that allowed me to answer anonymously.
87
33
5
 2
1
Compared to other instructors I have had, I rate this instructor:
Top 10%

41
Top 30%

32
Average

8
Lowest 30%

2
Lowest 10%

0
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was:
Much Lighter

1
Lighter

3
Same

59
Heavier

31
Much Heavier

10

Top
 



PHIL 314 Ethics

Evaluations are for Fall 1998, Fall 2000, Fall 2002, Fall 2004 and Fall 2006. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
 
 
 
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
The instructor presented material in an understandable manner.
31
17
3
2
1
The instructor's exams reflected what was covered in the course.
35
13
1
0
0
With this instructor I felt free to ask questions and express opinions.
30
19
3
2
0
If I asked for help with the course, this instructor provided help.
29
 16
9
0
0
This instructor used the same criteria to grade all students in the course.
32
16
4
2
0
The instructor provided timely feedback about my performance in the course.
32
18
2
1
1
The course requirements, including the grading criteria, were stated clearly in writing.
36
17
0
1
0
Materials used for this course (textbooks, readings, supplementary materials) were clear enough for me to understand.
16
27
4
6
1
This course was well organized.
32
19
2
1
0
This course contributed to my understanding of this subject.
30
18
2
2
2
This survey was administered in a manner that allowed me to answer anonymously.
39
13
2
0
0
Compared to other instructors I have had, I rate this instructor:
Top 10%

21
Top 30%

20
Average
10
Lowest 30%

3
Lowest 10%

0
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was:
Much Lighter

1
Lighter

6
Same

25
Heavier

17
Much Heavier

5

Top
 
 


PHIL 329 Skepticism (Topics in the History of Philosophy)

Evaluations are for Fall 2003 and Fall 2005. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
 
 
 
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
The instructor presented material in an understandable manner.
10
2
0
0
0
The instructor's exams reflected what was covered in the course.
11
1
0
0
0
With this instructor I felt free to ask questions and express opinions.
12
0
0
0
0
If I asked for help with the course, this instructor provided help.
10
2
0
0
0
This instructor used the same criteria to grade all students in the course.
9
1
2
0
0
The instructor provided timely feedback about my performance in the course.
10
1
0
1
0
The course requirements, including the grading criteria, were stated clearly in writing.
11
1
0
0
0
Materials used for this course (textbooks, readings, supplementary materials) were clear enough for me to understand.
6
6
0
0
0
This course was well organized.
11
1
0
0
0
This course contributed to my understanding of this subject.
11
0
1
0
0
This survey was administered in a manner that allowed me to answer anonymously.
12
0
0
0
0
Compared to other instructors I have had, I rate this instructor:
Top 10%

11
Top 30%

1
Average

0
Lowest 30%

0
Lowest 10%

0
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was:
Much Lighter

0
Lighter

0
Same

5
Heavier

5
Much Heavier

2





PHIL 331 Philosophy of Religion

Evaluations are for Fall 1999, Fall 2001, Spring 2003, Spring 2004, Spring 2005, Spring 2006 and Spring 2007. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
 
 
 
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
The instructor presented material in an understandable manner.
81
41
3
1
0
The instructor's exams reflected what was covered in the course.
88
38
0
0
0
With this instructor I felt free to ask questions and express opinions.
89
35
2
1
0
If I asked for help with the course, this instructor provided help.
88
35
7
2
0
This instructor used the same criteria to grade all students in the course.
81
33
11
1
0
The instructor provided timely feedback about my performance in the course.
83
39
5
0
0
The course requirements, including the grading criteria, were stated clearly in writing.
91
32
2
1
0
Materials used for this course (textbooks, readings, supplementary materials) were clear enough for me to understand.
65
51
5
6
1
This course was well organized.
94
40
3
0
0
This course contributed to my understanding of this subject.
96
46
0
6
1
This survey was administered in a manner that allowed me to answer anonymously.
89
38
1
0
0
Compared to other instructors I have had, I rate this instructor:
Top 10%

57
Top 30%

50
Average

21
Lowest 30%

0
Lowest 10%

0
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was:
Much Lighter

1
Lighter

3
Same

70
Heavier

48
Much Heavier

5

Top

 



PHIL 441 Theory of Knowledge

Evaluations are for Spring 2002, Spring 2004, and Spring 2007. Numbers refer to number of students, not percentages.
 
 
 
strongly agree
agree
neutral
disagree
strongly disagree
The instructor presented material in an understandable manner.
 6
4
0
0
0
The instructor's exams reflected what was covered in the course.
8
1
1
0
0
With this instructor I felt free to ask questions and express opinions.
7
3
0
0
0
If I asked for help with the course, this instructor provided help.
7
1
1
0
0
This instructor used the same criteria to grade all students in the course.
6
4
0
0
0
The instructor provided timely feedback about my performance in the course.
8
1
1
0
0
The course requirements, including the grading criteria, were stated clearly in writing.
8
2
0
0
0
Materials used for this course (textbooks, readings, supplementary materials) were clear enough for me to understand.
5
3
0
2
0
This course was well organized.
8
2
0
0
0
This course contributed to my understanding of this subject.
7
2
0
1
0
This survey was administered in a manner that allowed me to answer anonymously.
8
1
1
0
0
Compared to other instructors I have had, I rate this instructor:
Top 10%

7
Top 30%

2
Average

1
Lowest 30%

0
Lowest 10%

0
The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was:
Much Lighter

0
Lighter

1
Same

1
Heavier

7
Much Heavier

1

Top