IV. Illusion of Knowledge
A. The Illusion of Knowledge
1.
Some Initial Examples
a. Draw a
Bicycle
b. Simple Science
Knowledge: Seasons
c. Simple Science Knowledge: Phases of the Moon
d. Probability Estimates, Problem 1
e. Probability
Estimates, Problem 2
f. Probability Estimates, Problem 3
g. Probability Estimates, Problem 4
h. Probability
Estimates, Problem 5-7
f. Probability Estimates, Problem 3
2.
Mechanisms & Research
a. Mistaking
Coarse-Grained Understanding for Fine-Grained Understanding
i. Lawson's (2006) Draw-A-Bike Task
ii. Schneps (1989): Some Scientific
Misunderstandings: Seasons & Moon Phases
iii. Čech: Discourse Constraints?
iv. Vincente & Brewer (1993)
vi. Rozenblit: Why oh why?
b. Attributing
Knowledge Based On External Events
i. Valins (1966): My Heart Beats
For You
ii. Wolf & McFall (2006): And
You're Not So Bad Yourself
iii. Moore (2005): Which Are The Good
Computer Games?
c. Just-So Stories: Rationalization
i. Gazzaniga: Split-Brain Patients
ii. Sachs: Korsakoff's syndrome
iii. Nisbett & Wilson
B. Kahneman & Tversky
1. Base
Rate Neglect
a. Back to
Tversky & Kahneman's (1982) Taxi Cab Example
b. Taking Base Rate
into Account: Bayes' Theorem
c. Are Experts Immune? Casscells,
Schoenberger, & Grayboys (1978)
d. Moderating Base Rate:
Frequencies vs. Probabilities (Cosmides & Tooby)
e. Some (of many)
Explanations
i. Frequentist/Evolutionary Approach
(e.g., Cosmides & Tooby)
ii. Relevance Theory (Sperber & Wilson);
Cooperative Principle (Grice)
2.
Representativeness Heuristic
a. Back to Kahneman & Tversky's (1972) Example
b. Representativeness
& The Conjunction Fallacy: Tversky & Kahneman's (1983)
Example
c. Representativeness & Base Rate Neglect
d. Relevance Theory & The
Cooperative Principle
3.
Availability Heuristic
a. Back to Kahneman & Tversky's (1972) Example
b. Lichtenstein et
al. (1978): Mortality Likelihoods
c. Support Theory: Tversky & Koehler
(1994)
d. Decision Frames (Tversky &
Kahneman, 1981)
i. Dunegan (1983)
ii. Possible Explanations of Framing &
Support Effects?
C. And Two Final Practical Points
1.
Kahneman & Tversky's Planning Fallacy (e.g., Buehler, Griffin,
& MacDonald, 1997)
2.
Implications for Juries
a. Using
Schemas to Make Sense of Events (e.g., Pennington & Hastie's (1991)
Story Model)
b. Calculating
Probabilities That Something Happened
c. Relying on Availability
d. etc.